DC Housing Accountability Report

DC keeps fining the same landlords.
Nothing changes.

Since 2018, DC inspectors have issued 82,012 housing violations totaling $80,999,120 in fines. Yet in 4,401 buildings, inspectors have returned to cite the exact same problem (same building, same law) more than once. In 375 buildings, the same violation has been re-issued ten or more times. In 143 cases, the same violation has been re-cited for seven years or longer.

The fines pile up. The problems don't get fixed. DC's housing enforcement system is broken. The tenants paying the price are concentrated in the city's lowest-income, majority-Black wards.

$81M in fines assessed since 2018
4,401 buildings cited for the same violation more than once
375 buildings with the same violation cited 10+ times
143 violations re-cited for 7+ straight years

Exhibit A

222 citations

1200 North Capitol Street NW (Ward 6) has been cited for "failure to correct cracked or loose plaster, holes, decayed wood, water damag..." 222 times between 2022–2026. Total fines assessed: $137,628. The problem is still being cited today.

See building record →

Where DC's enforcement fails most

Repeat enforcement failures are not evenly distributed. Ward 8 has 2,277 building/violation combinations that have been cited three or more times. Ward 7 has 1,699. Ward 2 has 236. Ward 3 has 206.

Wards 7 and 8, DC's predominantly Black, lower-income wards in Southeast, have more than 9 times the repeat enforcement failures of Wards 2 and 3. DC isn't just failing tenants. It's failing them unequally.

Each "repeat violation" is a building-law combination cited 3 or more times on separate inspection dates.

The landlords DC can't seem to stop

These are the private landlords with the highest number of repeat violation instances: DC inspectors returned to cite the same problem, at the same address, under the same housing law, over and over. Fines were issued each time.

Other cities have figured this out

DC is not the only city with this problem, but other cities have built stronger tools to deal with it.

New York City
Alternative Enforcement Program

Buildings with persistently high violation rates are placed into a city-managed repair program. The city makes the repairs and bills the landlord directly. The landlord cannot opt out.

Los Angeles
Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP)

When a landlord fails to fix serious violations, tenants can pay rent into a city-held escrow account instead of to the landlord. The landlord gets nothing until the building is brought into compliance.

Boston, Philadelphia
Rental registries and license revocation

Landlords must register rental units and maintain a license to operate. Repeat violators can lose that license. No license, no rent.

The common thread: consequences that are automatic, not discretionary. DC's current system leaves collection and enforcement to chance. These cities don't.

What needs to change

Fines that go uncollected aren't enforcement. They're paperwork. When a landlord can ignore the same violation for eight years while DC issues citation after citation, the system is working for landlords, not tenants.

DC needs elected officials who will strengthen enforcement, mandate escalating penalties for repeat violations, and make collection of fines automatic, not optional.

All data from DC's Department of Buildings (DOB) open data, last updated May 2026. "Repeat violation" means the same building cited under the same housing statute on at least 3 separate inspection dates. DC Housing Authority (DCHA) is excluded from the landlord table. Fines shown are amounts assessed by inspectors; amounts actually collected by DC are not publicly available.